I have heard

fitnessk · #1 (**permalink**) 27-02-2007, 02:35 PM

I have hears that VPS is a good alternative to actuallyl having a dedicated server. you don't end up with your own server but have many of the functions, features and flexibililty of a dedicated server.

wantingawebsite · #2 (**permalink**) 27-02-2007, 05:48 PM

You do get most of the features of a dedicated server. You have root access and dedicated resources, however you are still sharing some resources so if you are on the same VPS server as someone using a lot of resources its like living in a small flat with a neighbour who has 50 ft speakers and likes ro rock 24/7 :P

If you can afford to, go dedicated. VPS is a solution if you are on a smaller budget and need root access or have been asked by your host to stop hogging the CPU.

monaghan · #3 (**permalink**) 27-02-2007, 06:45 PM

A VPS is a virtual server, so for all normal operations, you're running a small dedicated box. This of course comes with the responsibilities of securing and running a dedicated box!

webme · #4 (**permalink**) 28-02-2007, 03:02 AM

VPS has its pros and cons. Say the price, VPS is cheaper compared to a dedicated server. But if you want total control and you have the budget, then a dedicated server is just right for you.

paperclip · #5 (**permalink**) 01-03-2007, 12:49 AM

Good insights on the differences. I guess that unless you need total control of resources and a lot of stuff to host, a VPS should be fine.